Naushad’s Death: Defendants Granted 10 Days to Appoint Legal Counsel
The High Court has granted a 10-day period for the respondents to appoint legal counsel after the state appealed the acquittal of suspects in the fatal stabbing of Mohamed Ahmed Didi (Naushad) inside the "Class" shop in Maafannu. While the prosecution has requested that the accused, Ibrahim Faih Nizam and Siruhan Ali, be remanded in custody for the duration of the appeal, the bench of judges ruled that a decision regarding their detention will only be made once they have secured legal representation.


Ibrahim Faih Nizam, of Rathdebhaige, S. Maradhoo-Feydhoo, and Siruhan Ali, of Gulhenoorammaage, Th. Gaadhiffushi. | Raajje MV
The High Court has granted the respondents time to appoint legal counsel in the appeal of the acquittal of suspects charged with the fatal stabbing of Mohamed Ahmed Didi (Naushad) of Izmir, S. Hithadhoo.
The incident related to this prosecution occurred on February 24, 2023, at approximately 21:30. Naushad was attacked while inside the "Class" shop located on Muranga Magu in Maafannu. While inside the shop, he sustained deep stab wounds to his head, neck, chest, and abdomen, as well as to both knees.
The state has pressed charges against Ibrahim Faih Nizam, of Rathdebhaige, S. Maradhoo-Feydhoo, and Siruhan Ali, of Gulhenoorammaage, Th. Gaadhiffushi, in connection with this case. The defendants are charged with intentional murder using a sharp object. The indictment was filed under the Act on Prohibition of Intimidation and Possession of Dangerous Weapons and Sharp Objects.
Delivering the verdict in this case, Criminal Court Judge Ibrahim Ihsan ruled that the charge of intentional murder using a sharp object had not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The judge noted that the prosecution failed to meet the evidentiary standards required for Qisas (retaliatory) cases, nor did they satisfy the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt as stipulated under Article 51(h) of the Constitution.
Consequently, the State appealed the decision to the High Court. During Tuesday's hearing, the prosecution requested that the two individuals remain in custody pending the outcome of the trial. The State further provided the High Court with a detailed justification for seeking their continued detention.
However, the respondents in the appeal requested an opportunity to consult with legal counsel before a decision is reached on the matter. During the hearing, Faih, one of the defendants, accused the state of providing false information. He asserted that while the prosecution claims the attack was premeditated and involved prior surveillance, they must produce evidence to substantiate such allegations.
The High Court judges have granted a 10-day period for the appointment of legal counsel. The bench stated that a decision regarding their detention will be made following that period.
However, the judges reminded the defendant that the hearing would proceed as scheduled if they failed to appoint a legal representative within the 10-day period.
The High Court bench presiding over this case consists of Judge Ismail Shafeeu, Judge Abdul Rauf Ibrahim, and Judge Ibrahim Mahir.




