Raajje.mv
Raajje.mv
  • ރާއްޖެ
  • ދުނިޔެ
  • ކުޅިވަރު
  • ވިޔަފާރި - އިގްތިސާދު
  • ސިއްހަތު
  • ރިޕޯޓު
  • ފިލްމް - މިޔުޒިކް
  • ތަފާތު ޚަބަރު
  • ލައިފް ސްޓައިލް
local
Floor Crossing Motion

MPs summoned to Supreme Court to sign statements

Hearings of case concluded

ރުޝްދާ ރަޝީދު
Rushdha Rasheed, Raajje.mv | 15 އޯގަސްޓު 2017 | އަންގާރަ 06:14
From left to right: MPs Ameeth, Latheef, Saud and Waheed

From left to right: MPs Ameeth, Latheef, Saud and Waheed

The four MPs who had been stripped from their Parliament by the Elections Commission (EC), has been summoned to Supreme Court to sign their statements.

Members of Parliament for Thulusdhoo Constituency Mohamed Waheed Ibrahim, Vilingili Constituency Saud Hussain, Maduvvari Constituency Mohamed Ameeth and Dhihdhoo Constituency Abdul Latheef Mohamed had filed case in Supreme Court asking to review the decision made by EC regarding their seats.

The hearings of the case had been concluded on Sunday; the Court will issue the verdict next.

All MPs except MP Latheef are under Police custody.

On Sunday’s hearings, the Court heard statements from both sides.

In concluding the trial, Chief Justice Abdullah Saeed announced that in the next hearings, the Court will deliver a verdict. However, he did not specify a date for the sentencing.

Hisaan Hussain, lawyer for MP Waheed, made the argument that EC had stripped the MPs from their seats and announced bi-elections on biased grounds and had abused the Supreme Court ruling on floor crossing.

Hisaan also noted that Supreme Court was the final authority on status of MPs and their seats, as per clause 74 of the Constitution. She said in the event one of the three stipulations in the clause had occurred, then the Commission must send it to Supreme Court. As such, she argued that EC had no grounds to declare his seat void.

Ali Shah, lawyer for MP Saud, also argued on the same points, stating that ruling Progressive Party of the Maldives had no good intentions.

He said that MP Saud was removed from the Party on April 13th, removed him from the slot in the National Security Committee and the Party viber group. Shah further noted that it was not possible for Saud to be dismissed from the Party twice, without having had registered again.

Prosecution had argued that until their dismissal from the Party on July 18th, they were still members from the Party and therefore, the Supreme Court ruling was applicable to them.

Comments

Related Articles

Court to take witness statements in Fiyaz's case on Thursday

Court to take witness statements in Fiyaz's case on Thursday

01 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017
Foreign bodies have no jurisdiction over Court rulings: President

Foreign bodies have no jurisdiction over Court rulings: President

31 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017
High Court rejects MDP case against EC

High Court rejects MDP case against EC

30 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017
Court to analyze video evidence against Wisam on Tuesday

Court to analyze video evidence against Wisam on Tuesday

30 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017
MPs exempt from blame, all falls on public: MP Musthafa

MPs exempt from blame, all falls on public: MP Musthafa

29 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017

On This Day

February 3
Veterans Tournament: Hamid wins singles event
20251 Year Ago
sport

Veterans Tournament: Hamid wins singles event

Interim results of MDP parliamentary primaries, announced
20242 Years Ago
local

Interim results of MDP parliamentary primaries, announced

Maldives welcomed 172,536 tourists in the first month of 2023
20233 Years Ago
local

Maldives welcomed 172,536 tourists in the first month of 2023

First Lady Fazna inaugurates 50-hour dive event, Ocean 6|50
20224 Years Ago
sport

First Lady Fazna inaugurates 50-hour dive event, Ocean 6|50

Maldives Covid-19 case total reaches 16,276
20215 Years Ago
local

Maldives Covid-19 case total reaches 16,276

Passionate politicking: why the People\'s Majlis is failing the Maldivian people
20197 Years Ago
report

Passionate politicking: why the People\'s Majlis is failing the Maldivian people

Criminal Court rejects habeas corpus motion filed by defense over SC ruling
20188 Years Ago
local

Criminal Court rejects habeas corpus motion filed by defense over SC ruling

ރާއްޖެކުޅިވަރުދުނިޔެވިޔަފާރި - އިގްތިސާދުރިޕޯޓުފޮޓޯވާހަކަސިއްހަތުތަފާތު ޚަބަރުލައިފް ސްޓައިލް
RaajjeMV
RaajjeTV
Raajje Sport
RaajjeTV Live
RaajjeTV PR
RaajjeMV
Raajje.mv

Copyright © 2010-2025 Raajje Television Pvt Ltd.

All rights reserved

ޕްރައިވެސީ ޕޮލިސީކިޔުންތެރިންގެ ހިޔާލު