Nasheed: Political Leaders Most Vulnerable at Public Gatherings
The Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) has expressed grave concern over a parliamentary committee's decision to withhold security services for former presidents during their participation in political activities. Speaking at a press conference, former President Mohamed Nasheed emphasized that political gatherings are precisely when protection is most critical, warning that this withdrawal of security could pose a significant threat to their personal safety.


The Chairperson of the MDP, former President Mohamed Nasheed. | Raajje MV
The opposition Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) has expressed concern over a decision by the Parliament’s Committee on Security Services to amend regulations so that the Maldives National Defence Force (MNDF) is no longer required to provide security for former presidents at political rallies and protests.
The MDP expressed its concerns regarding this matter during a press conference held on Sunday.
Speaking at the press conference, MDP Chairperson and former President Mohamed Nasheed stated that the party would not accept any changes to regulations that would diminish the state-mandated protection provided to former presidents. Nasheed further emphasized that the security forces must prioritize maintaining safety and security particularly during political gatherings.
Former President Nasheed further noted that, looking at international history, many attacks targeting high-profile political figures have occurred during such gatherings and protests. Consequently, the MDP maintains that withdrawing security during these times is a decision that could potentially endanger their lives.
This pattern is evident across the globe, where historical data on attacks against political figures shows that such incidents most frequently occur during political rallies. Consequently, the MDP expresses its profound concern regarding this matter.The Chairperson of the MDP, former President Mohamed Nasheed.
The Parliament's 241 Committee decided to amend this regulation by a majority vote during a closed-door session. However, the MDP continues to maintain that this decision was made for political purposes.




