IFJ raises alarm over bill seeking to shut down media outlets and target journalists
The harsh measures in the proposed bill include fines ranging from MVR 5,000 to MVR 25,000 for journalists who violate the commission's undrafted regulations
The government's proposal to regulate the media according to its preferences has attracted significant scrutiny.
The International Federation of Journalists' Association (IFJ) has condemned the media bill proposing to abolish media outlets and punish journalists in the Maldives, calling for its immediate withdrawal.
In a press release issued on Wednesday, the International Federation of Journalists' Association (IFJ) stated that they are concerned about the bill submitted by MP for Thulhaadhoo constituency Abdul Hannan Aboobakuru, which proposes to abolish the current Maldives Media Council (MMC) and Maldives Broadcasting Commission (Broadcom) and replace these two institutions with a "Maldives Media and Broadcasting Commission" with additional powers and controls.
The statement also noted that the harsh measures in the proposed bill include fines ranging from MVR 5,000 to MVR 25,000 for journalists who violate the commission's undrafted regulations, and fines of MVR 100,000 for media outlets. In addition to this, the commission would have the power to suspend media registrations, block news websites, and halt broadcasts during investigations.
IFJ pointed out that a similar bill was first introduced to the People's Majlis in November 2024 by the same political party. That bill was withdrawn due to opposition from media outlets. The newly proposed bill suggests creating a new commission consisting of seven members, with three members appointed by the president and four nominated from the media sector. Unlike the previous model, the president would appoint the commission's chairperson, who would have significant powers.
IFJ stated that the bill was drafted without consultation with journalists, their unions, and media outlets, raising questions about its true intentions. They also noted that the proposed bill would restrict free journalism and create an atmosphere of fear and danger among journalists. IFJ also noted that the ability to remove members elected by media outlets through a no-confidence vote in the parliament would undermine their independence and autonomy.
IFJ emphasized the need for genuine consultation and industry participation in media regulation. They stated that neglecting to strengthen relationships with journalists and their unions is a fundamental misconception that undermines the true goal of strengthening journalism and protecting democracy and press freedom.
