PNC backbenchers face absolute humiliation of their own making
A ruling party lawmaker sparked controversy after a viral video showed him aggressively confronting the opposition over a returned bill. The dispute centered on the Organ Transplantation Act, which was initially drafted by the government and passed by its own supermajority before being rejected by President Muizzu. Critics argue the outburst highlights the internal pressure on loyalist lawmakers who blindly follow executive orders despite legislative inconsistencies.


During a session of the People's Majlis. | majlis
A freshly leaked video capturing a ruling party lawmaker screaming in an absolute fit of pure rage has recently taken the internet by storm, shining a harsh spotlight on the total breakdown of legislative behavior.
Throwing any shred of parliamentary decorum out the window, this particular lawmaker was seen aggressively pointing fingers and confronting an opposition lawmaker face-to-face, entirely bypassing the basic rule of addressing the Speaker's chair.
Family ties and the comical reality
Observing this unhinged meltdown naturally makes one wonder what on earth could have triggered such an aggressive retaliation.
Had the opposition dared to launch a deeply cutting, personal strike?
Coincidentally, the screaming lawmaker just happens to be President Dr. Mohamed Muizzu’s own brother-in-law, which immediately raised a flurry of additional questions.
Was the public witnessing the explosion of a notorious and deeply rooted controversy, or did the opposition land a rhetorical blow directly targeting the head of state himself?
However, when one actually leans in and listens closely to the audio of the argument, the reality of the situation turns out to be utterly hilarious.
It is genuinely hard to comprehend that such an intense, vein-popping tantrum was provoked by the actual topic up for discussion.
Puppet show of a supermajority
The subject under debate was neither highly controversial nor was the draft legislation itself of any staggering national importance.
It is deeply perplexing why any politician would feel compelled to display such raw fury over it.
The fight was centered on a piece of legislation that the chamber had already approved and sent off for ratification, only for the incumbent to reject it and dump it back on their desks for reconsideration.
One must remember that this very bill was originally pushed through by this exact same Parliament, where the People’s National Congress (PNC) commands a crushing supermajority.
These lawmakers are individuals who do absolutely nothing but fall in line behind the current administration.
lawmaker The legislation was initially drawn up by the government itself and its loudest cheerleaders during the preliminary debates were none other than these PNC loyalists.
Even the parliamentary committee that scrutinized the text was completely dominated by the PNC.
No matter what objections or changes the opposition tried to bring forward, PNC has the unilateral power to steamroll any legislation exactly how they want it within a matter of minutes.
The committee belongs to PNC, the People’s Majlis belongs to PNC and PNC, fundamentally, belongs to Muizzu.
To put it in plain terms, absolutely no decision, whether it is a major bill or a simple resolution, ever passes through those doors if it goes against the explicit desires of the head of state.
Brainless approval of a defective law
The "Organ Transplantation Act," which sat at the center of this embarrassing legislative circus, was absolutely no exception to this rule. It was drafted by the administration and rubber-stamped into law by the regime's own foot soldiers.
However, the government, specifically Muizzu himself, chose to send it back. This bizarre turn of events leaves us with a mountain of questions.
Why on earth did he return it?
The most logical conclusion is that the president decided it was totally unfit to be ratified or found specific clauses completely unpalatable.
However, that line of thinking lands us right into a far more baffling dilemma: why did the government's own parliamentary army allow such an embarrassing legislative failure to happen in the first place?
Why would a legal text meticulously drafted by the Attorney General and introduced by a card-carrying government loyalist be sent right back to the drawing board for revisions?
The explanation behind this is glaringly obvious. PNC rank-and-file would never dream of defying the administration's wishes, nor would they ever allow the opposition to exert even an ounce of influence as long as they kept their guard up.
This has been the standard operating procedure for this entire parliamentary term.
Consequently, the bill must have been passed on the first go-round exactly how the government and Muizzu initially wanted it.
The real puzzle now is why, after being rubber-stamped entirely to his liking, it was suddenly rejected by him.
Only the inner circle of the government and the president know the real answer. Perhaps they realized they completely missed a crucial detail after the fact, or maybe they just suddenly decided to pivot in a completely different direction.
Tragic meltdown of the yes-men
While it is perfectly reasonable for a leader to return a bill in good faith to make it better, the burning question remains: why the dramatic temper tantrum? Why stand there pointing fingers and verbally assaulting the opposition over a total mess of your own creation?
If a decision they made was ultimately branded as a mistake by their very own boss, all they had to do was quietly amend the text and move on with their days.
There was absolutely no logical reason to drag the names of opposition members into it, invoke the previous administration, or start hurling insulting metaphors.
If they are the ones who screwed up the paperwork, they are the ones who should quietly fix it without turning the chamber into a public circus.
The opposition does not even need to be a part of what is strictly an internal clean-up job.
When the dust settles, this entire embarrassing incident shines a blinding light on the pathetic current state of PNC's parliamentary delegation, who have completely surrendered their intellectual independence to the president.
It perfectly exposes the grim consequences of functioning as mindless "yes-men" who blindly execute whatever orders are handed down to them.
It uncovers the immense and boiling pressure these politicians are operating under, laying bare the deeply pitiful position they occupy, forever trapped between their demand for absolute, unquestioning loyalty and the chaotic inconsistencies of the leadership they blindly worship.




