Calling a habitual liar a pathological liar does not constitute a lack of respect: Musthafa

Calling a habitual liar a "pathological liar" does not constitute a sign of disrespect, according to legal expert Musthafa Hameed.

Speaking on RaajjeTV’s "Fala Surukhee" program, Musthafa Hameed stated that Maldivians have historically been a people who treat one another with mutual respect.

However, he noted that leading up to the 2018 presidential election, a group of Maldivians was seen attempting to undermine this mutual respect. Musthafa Hameed highlighted that, during that period, there were instances where foreign leaders were openly mocked and ridiculed.

Musthafa Hameed stated that assigning various monikers to the rulers of the Maldives is a long-standing tradition driven by various historical factors. He noted that this practice is evident in the names given to figures such as King Kalhu Mohamed, Bodu Thakurufaanu, and Dhon Bandaarain.

In this regard, Musthafa stated that if an individual lies excessively, they may be labeled a habitual liar. He further noted that launching a large-scale campaign to force compliance upon the public is not the most appropriate approach to addressing the issue.

Furthermore, Musthafa stated that respect cannot be forcibly demanded by anyone. He added that coercing employees into attending government rallies does not reflect the true level of public support for President Muizzu.

Musthafa has stated that if President Muizzu were to call for a public gathering based on voluntary participation alone, it is unlikely that even 300 people would attend.

The true extent of support for President Muizzu will only become clear once citizens begin attending rallies of their own free will, he stated.