As discussions intensify regarding the vote to combine two elections, the focus remains diverted from the core issue: Inthi

Former Member of Parliament for North Maafannu constituency and legal expert Imthiyaz Fahmy has criticized the proposed referendum on synchronizing presidential and parliamentary elections, stating that while the ballot question is wordy, it fails to address the core issue at hand.

Speaking on Raajje TV’s "Noonekey" campaign program, Fahmy stated that many people are complaining about the lack of clarity regarding the question posed in this Saturday's scheduled referendum. He noted that while some argue the question is phrased correctly, the Constitution mandates that any question posed in a public referendum must be direct and specifically targeted at the issue in question.

Fahmy stated that the vote failed to address the core question at hand, noting that the matter is currently sub judice. He expressed hope that the court would reach a just conclusion on the issue. He further emphasized the importance of submitting such constitutional matters to the judiciary, ensuring they are scrutinized through the proper legal process.

These major concerns and issues are surfacing primarily because significant amendments to a fundamental document like the Constitution are being pursued with such haste, without allowing adequate time for the public to reflect. It is not just the public; even those responsible for implementing these changes are not taking sufficient time, leading to a multitude of complications. Many parties are expressing grievances or claiming a lack of clarity regarding the matter. While some argue the question is framed correctly, others question what exactly remains unclear. For instance, the Constitution mandates that in a public referendum, the question must be directly focused on the specific point at hand. In this case, amidst various narratives, the core question that needs to be asked has not been presented with the necessary clarity or focus. As this matter is currently before the court, we anticipate that a proper judicial determination will be made.

Imthiyaz Fahmy (Inthi), legal professional and former Member of Parliament for the North Maafannu constituency.

Fahmy alleged that these significant legal concerns arise because President Dr. Mohamed Muizzu’s administration is pushing through abrupt constitutional amendments without providing adequate time for public consultation or even for members of Parliament to review the changes. He stated that holding such a vote following rushed constitutional amendments, made without regard for public concern, is something that must be viewed with skepticism from the outset.

Furthermore, Fahmy stated that this constitutional amendment was not introduced in the manner envisioned by the Constitution. He warned that if the vote concludes in the government's favor, the resulting negative consequences would be far-reaching. Consequently, Fahmy urged the Maldivian people to vote "no" in the upcoming referendum scheduled for Saturday.