IFJ concerned over foreign journalists’ visas being rejected ahead of Maldives’ elections
The joint opposition have expressed concern over reports that several international journalists had had their applications for visas to cover the presidential elections rejected
IFJ condemned the Maldives government over their handling of visas for foreign journalists
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) has strongly criticised the Maldives’ government after allegations emerged of foreign journalists being denied visas to cover the elections on September 23.
In a recent press statement, the organization condemned the Maldives government over their handling of visas for foreign journalists, and urged the government to ensure journalists, local and foreign, can freely cover the elections.
In the press statement, IFJ noted that the joint opposition issued a statement expressing concerns over reports that several international journalists had had their applications for visas to cover the presidential elections rejected.
The Elections Commission refuted the allegation, saying that of the 37 applications received before the August 14 deadline, 11 were rejected due to insufficient documentation.
“Strict requirements were set for foreign journalists wanting to cover the presidential elections including, submitting the application prior to August 14 to receive a permit from the election commission. They then had to apply to the immigration department for a business visa, which includes having a Maldivian sponsor, completing a ‘vetting form’ which includes details of employment, travel history and qualifications, as well as a police certificate.”
In August, the Immigration Department issued a press release stating that the elections were open to monitor by foreign media but warning foreign journalists that they would be subjected to “punitive measures” should they report on the elections without the appropriate visa.
IFJ stated that in February, Maldives’ authorities arrested and deported two AFP journalists - India’s Money Sharma and UK’s Atish Ravji Patel for reporting on the state of emergency on tourist visa.
The joint opposition said: “The visa measures are a deliberate attempt to restrict foreign journalists from traveling to the Maldives for the election, thus reducing independent scrutiny of the vote and President Yameen’s likely attempts to steal it.”
The IFJ said: “Journalists, both local and foreign, should be guaranteed free access to cover the upcoming elections. The reports of journalist visas been rejected is a worrying sign for the media, which adds to the growing concerns over reports of increasing harassment against journalists in the lead up to the elections. The IFJ demands free and secure environment for local and foreign journalists covering the election.”
