Raajje.mv
Raajje.mv
  • ރާއްޖެ
  • ދުނިޔެ
  • ކުޅިވަރު
  • ވިޔަފާރި - އިގްތިސާދު
  • ސިއްހަތު
  • ރިޕޯޓު
  • ފިލްމް - މިޔުޒިކް
  • ތަފާތު ޚަބަރު
  • އިސްލާމް
  • ލައިފް ސްޓައިލް
localMaldives-Apex Realty

Indian High Court marks Apex Realty's dispute with Maldives for arbitration

15 މެއި 2017 | ހޯމަ 13:00

Justice Gautam S. Patel of the High Court in Bombay recommended that the case be filed for arbitration, earlier this month

ޝާން އަނީސް
Shan Anees | 15 މެއި 2017 | ހޯމަ 13:00
Naadhee, on the of two plots given to Apex Realty to develop flats on

Naadhee, on the of two plots given to Apex Realty to develop flats on

An Indian High Court has ruled that Maldivian government’s termination of the housing contract with the Apex Realty Group be put forth to arbitration.

Justice Gautam S. Patel of the High Court in Bombay ruled earlier this month that the Maldives’ decision to terminate the contract is unlawful and recommended that the case be filed for arbitration.

Further weighing that Apex Realty could face considerable damages due to the termination, Justice Patel had issued a Protective Order, putting forth a number of recommendations to be implemented until a decision is made in the dispute resolution process.

These recommendations, which would provide Apex Realty with an interim solution, are thus:

  • That the Maldivian government refrain from reassigning the housing contract to another party.
  • That Apex Realty be allowed to continue the project as per the contract.
  • That the government refrain from acquiring the plots of land that Apex Realty had been developing from the company.
  • That the government be refrain from obstructing or hindering the Apex Realty’s work on the plots in anyway.

Indian arbitration laws stipulate that the case be filed within 90 days of this ruling, therefore Justice Patel had also ordered that Apex Realty forward the case for arbitration by 15th June.

The Maldivian government terminated the contract given to Apex Realty to develop luxury housing unit in two plots of land – Oreon and Naadhee – on the grounds that the company breached it by not commencing work adequately, as dictated in the contract. The government announced its decision on April 19th.

The company, which is a subsidiary of Tata Housing, has refuted this and denied having made any breaches, adding that the housing project had been underway.

Popular

1

MDP postpones protest to the night of August 13

2

Over MVR 10 million disbursed to deceased individuals: NSPA

3

Government must accountable regarding conversion of Project Ayla into an SEZ and selection process that awarded Henley & Partners contract for residency-by-investment visa program

4

BML introduces changes to its organizational structure and executive leadership team

5

Large section of Boduthakurufaanu Magu quay wall restricted and handed over to Defense Ministry

More from Raajje.mv

07 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017

Nasheed and Aus Amb. discuss "Indian Ocean stability, democracy and more"

07 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017
Nasheed and Aus Amb. discuss "Indian Ocean stability, democracy and more"
06 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017

Scholars head to court over niqab issue

06 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017
Scholars head to court over niqab issue
02 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017

Court to reach a verdict in Fiyaz's case by the end of Feb

02 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017
Court to reach a verdict in Fiyaz's case by the end of Feb
01 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017

Court issues preliminary injunction halting Kaadehdhoo Airport agreement cancellation

01 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017
Court issues preliminary injunction halting Kaadehdhoo Airport agreement cancellation
01 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017

Court to take witness statements in Fiyaz's case on Thursday

01 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017
Court to take witness statements in Fiyaz's case on Thursday
31 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017

Foreign bodies have no jurisdiction over Court rulings: President

31 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017
Foreign bodies have no jurisdiction over Court rulings: President
30 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017

High Court rejects MDP case against EC

30 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017
High Court rejects MDP case against EC
30 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017

Court to analyze video evidence against Wisam on Tuesday

30 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017
Court to analyze video evidence against Wisam on Tuesday
29 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017

Supreme Court had acted unjustly on Nazim: Azim

29 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017
Supreme Court had acted unjustly on Nazim: Azim
06 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017

Court rules not enough evidence to prove man forged signature on finance ministry check to get MVR 900,000

06 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017
Court rules not enough evidence to prove man forged signature on  finance ministry check to get MVR 900,000
ރާއްޖެދުނިޔެކުޅިވަރުވިޔަފާރި - އިގްތިސާދުސިއްހަތުރިޕޯޓުފިލްމް - މިޔުޒިކްތަފާތު ޚަބަރުއިސްލާމްލައިފް ސްޓައިލް
RaajjeMV
RaajjeTV
Raajje Sport
RaajjeTV Live
RaajjeTV PR
RaajjeMV
Raajje.mv

Copyright © 2010-2025 Raajje Television Pvt Ltd.

All rights reserved

ޕްރައިވެސީ ޕޮލިސީކިޔުންތެރިންގެ ހިޔާލުޓާމްސް އޮފްޔޫސް