A recent statement issued by the Maldives Police Service (MPS) concerning the main opposition Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP)’s planned rally has drawn significant criticism, with many labelling it as overtly political and inappropriate for a law enforcement agency.
The statement, released on Wednesday, addressed the opposition party’s upcoming protest at Artificial Beach scheduled for Friday night. The rally is expected to draw large crowds as it aims to raise concerns over alleged government corruption and the erosion of citizens' rights.
In the statement, police claimed to have received information suggesting that criminal groups were planning to disrupt the gathering and cause unrest in the capital, Malé City. However, the statement did not provide any specific details or evidence, and no arrests have been made in connection with the alleged threat.
The vague and speculative nature of the claims has led to strong reactions from political figures and the public. Critics argue that the statement appeared designed to intimidate potential participants and discredit a constitutionally protected political activity.
Former MP for North Maafannu constituency Imthiyaz Fahmy described the statement as a recycled and baseless attempt to undermine public confidence, while former Defence Minister Mariya Ahmed Didi criticized it as speculative, politically charged, and lacking professionalism. She expressed concern over the use of language that appeared to cast doubt on the peaceful nature of the gathering and stressed the importance of upholding the presumption of innocence.
In this Statement @PoliceMv you write “sulhaveri harakaathehge namugai” … that’s political, unprofessional & presumtous. Appreciate you keep your professionalism and not release “political” Statements. Thank you 🙏 @PoliceMv in neruvvi bayaanugai “sulhaveri evvumehge namugai”… https://t.co/4lZtT8pKP7
— Mariya Didi 🇲🇻 (@MariyaDidi) October 1, 2025
Mariya also urged the police to maintain institutional integrity and avoid being influenced by political interests. Her remarks reflect broader concerns that law enforcement may be used to suppress dissent under the guise of public safety.
Public backlash was also evident on social media, with many users voicing their disapproval of the statement, particularly on ‘X’ where it was widely shared and discussed.
MDP has responded by calling on the police not to obstruct the planned rally and emphasized the importance of allowing peaceful political expression as guaranteed under the law.
The situation has intensified scrutiny of the police institution, raising questions about its impartiality and role in safeguarding democratic freedoms in the lead-up to the high-profile protest.