The National Drug Agency (NDA), which is tasked with the critical responsibility of treating drug users, is expected to operate with the highest level of independence and policy integrity. As it faces a sensitive situation, experts stress that the agency’s work is highly technical, deeply reliant on professional expertise, and demands significant effort and dedication.

However, NDA is currently facing significant challenges, with the entire organization reportedly under heavy political influence. Many political appointees involved lack a basic understanding of the agency’s core work. Experts have warned that when leadership is in the hands of those unfamiliar with the fundamentals of drug treatment, it’s difficult to expect meaningful progress or improvements.

The institution’s operations are currently unsatisfactory. NDA Chairman’s interference with staff, often without consulting professionals and disregarding established laws and regulations, has become a significant barrier to effective work. Key decisions impacting the agency’s overall functioning are being made without board approval, and the use of inexperienced personnel raises concerns about management’s approach. With leadership favoring only a select few, it appears that the agency’s progress has stalled, leaving its operations effectively paralyzed.

This situation is not unique to the NDA and reflects a broader pattern of disregarding established principles, regulations, and policies. According to multiple employees, the agency has increasingly been managed in a way that amplifies the political influence and control of the Board Chairperson. Unlike other institutions, however, NDA holds a critical responsibility to society as a whole. Despite this, it currently functions more like a political instrument than a professional organization.

At present, many experienced staff members within the institution feel disheartened and reluctant to remain part of an organization where their concerns are overlooked. Meanwhile, the overseeing authority appears largely indifferent, with little indication that leadership acknowledges NDA’s accountability to the Ministry of Homeland Security and Technology. It may be that the agency receives limited attention because it doesn’t offer political gains or recognition.