Raajje.mv
Raajje.mv
  • ރާއްޖެ
  • ދުނިޔެ
  • ކުޅިވަރު
  • ވިޔަފާރި - އިގްތިސާދު
  • ސިއްހަތު
  • ރިޕޯޓު
  • ފިލްމް - މިޔުޒިކް
  • ތަފާތު ޚަބަރު
  • އިސްލާމް
  • ލައިފް ސްޓައިލް
localBML vs Presidential Commission

Civil Court rejects BML's stay order on presidential commission

29 ޖުލައި 2019 | ހޯމަ 09:08

BML filed the case against Presidential Commission on Corruption and Asset Recover earlier this month

އައިޝަތު ޝާނީ
Aishath Shaany | 29 ޖުލައި 2019 | ހޯމަ 09:08
Civil Court

Civil Court

Civil Court has concluded the case submitted by Bank of Maldives (BML), against the Presidential Commission on Corruption and Asset Recovery.

BML filed the case at the court, after refusing to provide information to the commission citing a High Court ruling and Article 72 (e) of the Criminal Procedure Act. The case headed to trial earlier this month, after failing the dispute resolution stage.

The Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) had also intervened in the case.

The court, on Monday, ruled that there "are no grounds" to issue a stay order in the case.

Senior officials at the bank were summoned to the parliament’s public accounts’ committee on July 16, regarding the over MVR 1.4 billion stolen from the state coffers through the Maldives Marketing and Public Relations Corporation (MMPRC) and a private company called SoF during the previous administration.

There, its deputy chief executive officer Mohamed Shareef had revealed that the bank stopped cooperating with authorities in the case, saying that it has been advised to not give out information “without a court order.”

ACC President Muavviz Rasheed told the parliament’s committee on independent institutions that BML’s refusal to cooperate ‘has been a hindrance to the investigation.’

BML is to have cooperated with the investigative bodies until July 7.

BML denies any negligence in the MMPRC graft case, but admitted that they had only informed the Maldives Monetary Authority (MMA)’s Financial Intelligence Unit regarding recorded suspicious transactions.

While these transactions are to have been observed in 2015, the bank accused MMA’s former deputy governor Neeza Imad and FIU’s former head Athif Shakoor of authorizing to release the accounts despite bank’s decision to withhold them.

Both Neeza and Athif deny the allegation, and have asked the public finance committee for the opportunity to present their sides.

Authorities are yet to recover any of the funds stolen in the country’s biggest corruption case.

Popular

1

Reporting USD Rate Above or Below MVR 15.42 Prohibited; Black Market Reports Face MVR 500,000 Fine

2

Red Crescent celebrates 17 years by constructing its future in high-rise concrete

3

Cabinet decides to restrict accessibility of SIM cards for expatriates working in Maldives

4

Black market USD rates surge past MVR 22.85!

5

State appeals release of suspect accused of smuggling drugs into Maafushi Prison via drone!

More from Raajje.mv

07 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017

Court to hear Sheikh Imran's appeal case on Wednesday

07 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017
Court to hear Sheikh Imran's appeal case on Wednesday
06 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017

Scholars head to court over niqab issue

06 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017
Scholars head to court over niqab issue
02 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017

Court to reach a verdict in Fiyaz's case by the end of Feb

02 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017
Court to reach a verdict in Fiyaz's case by the end of Feb
01 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017

Court issues preliminary injunction halting Kaadehdhoo Airport agreement cancellation

01 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017
Court issues preliminary injunction halting Kaadehdhoo Airport agreement cancellation
01 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017

Court to take witness statements in Fiyaz's case on Thursday

01 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017
Court to take witness statements in Fiyaz's case on Thursday
31 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017

Foreign bodies have no jurisdiction over Court rulings: President

31 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017
Foreign bodies have no jurisdiction over Court rulings: President
30 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017

High Court rejects MDP case against EC

30 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017
High Court rejects MDP case against EC
30 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017

Court to analyze video evidence against Wisam on Tuesday

30 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017
Court to analyze video evidence against Wisam on Tuesday
29 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017

Supreme Court had acted unjustly on Nazim: Azim

29 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017
Supreme Court had acted unjustly on Nazim: Azim
06 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017

Court rules not enough evidence to prove man forged signature on finance ministry check to get MVR 900,000

06 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017
Court rules not enough evidence to prove man forged signature on  finance ministry check to get MVR 900,000
ރާއްޖެދުނިޔެކުޅިވަރުވިޔަފާރި - އިގްތިސާދުސިއްހަތުރިޕޯޓުފިލްމް - މިޔުޒިކްތަފާތު ޚަބަރުއިސްލާމްލައިފް ސްޓައިލް
RaajjeMV
RaajjeTV
Raajje Sport
RaajjeTV Live
RaajjeTV PR
RaajjeMV
Raajje.mv

Copyright © 2010-2025 Raajje Television Pvt Ltd.

All rights reserved

ޕްރައިވެސީ ޕޮލިސީކިޔުންތެރިންގެ ހިޔާލުޓާމްސް އޮފްޔޫސް