Raajje.mv
Raajje.mv
  • ރާއްޖެ
  • ދުނިޔެ
  • ކުޅިވަރު
  • ވިޔަފާރި - އިގްތިސާދު
  • ސިއްހަތު
  • ރިޕޯޓު
  • ފިލްމް - މިޔުޒިކް
  • ތަފާތު ޚަބަރު
  • އިސްލާމް
  • ލައިފް ސްޓައިލް
localAirport Protesters

High Court upholds lower court verdict on airport protesters

Defendants given a three-year suspended sentence

ރުޝްދާ ރަޝީދު
Rushdha Rasheed | 25 އޮކްޓޯބަރު 2017 | ބުދަ 08:46
Some of the protesters with their legal representation

Some of the protesters with their legal representation

High Court has upheld the Criminal Court verdict on protesters in former Ibrahim Nasir International Airport (INIA) back in March, 2015. Criminal Court sentenced 15 individuals for three months on a three-year suspended sentence.

The group was charged for having protested in INIA’s departure hall terminal calling to free former President Mohamed Nasheed.

The protesters are:

  • Male’ City Deputy Mayor, Sifa Mohamed
  • Zahura Moosa, Dhonad, Gn. Fuvahmulah
  • Shameema Adamfulhu, M. New Hilman
  • Shafiyya Zubair, H. Veyovilla
  • Mohamed Ibrahim Manik, Ma. Naaringuge
  • Mariyam Zubair, Kalhumagigey S. Hulhudhoo
  • Khadheeja Shadhiya, Schedulus S. Hithadhoo
  • Fathimath Rasheed, Male’ Municipality Special Register number 5866
  • Fareesha Ahmed, H. Tivegalight
  • Aminath Zimna, M. Thanthaara
  • Aminath Zahira, G. Aakaashvilla
  • Aishath Mamdhoohaa, G. Dhuvaafaru
  • Aminath Dhumaina Irushad, Ma. Beachhouse
  • Yumna, M. Fehifaiy

They were sentenced under clause 88 (a) of the Penal Code, referencing clause 24 (7) of the Freedom of Assembly Act.

The Criminal Court verdict in March last year, states that the Court was not able to review the case of Aminath Shaaneez Saeed (M. Nirolhu), who had not attended any hearings.

Their lawyer Nazim Sattar in High Court noted the verdict was delivered on the basis of the testimony of one Police officer. He also noted only one person had testified the group had protested in INIA.

The verdict noted they did not have any proof from Police authorizing their protest in INIA. Additionally, the verdict noted the defense had not put forth any arguments that nullified the prosecution’s evidence.

The Judge had decreed the verdict is a suspended one for three years, with the stipulation that during this period if any one of them is proven guilty of any other crime, then they have to serve this sentence as well.

More from Raajje.mv

01 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017

Court issues preliminary injunction halting Kaadehdhoo Airport agreement cancellation

01 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017
Court issues preliminary injunction halting Kaadehdhoo Airport agreement cancellation
01 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017

Court to take witness statements in Fiyaz's case on Thursday

01 ފެބުރުއަރީ 2017
Court to take witness statements in Fiyaz's case on Thursday
31 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017

Foreign bodies have no jurisdiction over Court rulings: President

31 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017
Foreign bodies have no jurisdiction over Court rulings: President
31 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017

Wisam verdict scheduled for March 9th

31 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017
Wisam verdict scheduled for March 9th
30 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017

High Court rejects MDP case against EC

30 ޖެނުއަރީ 2017
High Court rejects MDP case against EC
ރާއްޖެދުނިޔެކުޅިވަރުވިޔަފާރި - އިގްތިސާދުސިއްހަތުރިޕޯޓުފިލްމް - މިޔުޒިކްތަފާތު ޚަބަރުއިސްލާމްލައިފް ސްޓައިލް
RaajjeMV
RaajjeTV
Raajje Sport
RaajjeTV Live
RaajjeTV PR
RaajjeMV
Raajje.mv

Copyright © 2010-2025 Raajje Television Pvt Ltd.

All rights reserved

ޕްރައިވެސީ ޕޮލިސީކިޔުންތެރިންގެ ހިޔާލު